Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

54

42%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.