Skip to Content
Main content

PS 58 SCHOOL OF HEROES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

138

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

137

26%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

112

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

92

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

143
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

70

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

144
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

29

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

25

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

156

37%

LEVEL 4

132

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

161

38%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

38

37%

LEVEL 2

44

43%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

39

44%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

302
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

164

34%

LEVEL 4

138

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

285
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

70

15%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

173

36%

LEVEL 4

112

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

35

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

48

40%

LEVEL 4

30

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

103

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

136

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

280
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

85

17%

LEVEL 2

132

27%

LEVEL 3

170

34%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.