Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 VINCENT D GRIPPO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

147

37%

LEVEL 4

101

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

152

41%

LEVEL 4

80

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

77

40%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

85

47%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

233
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

98

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

215
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

138

41%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

137

40%

LEVEL 4

98

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

149

46%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

28

65%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

210
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

36

14%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

100

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

199
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

121

47%

LEVEL 4

78

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

242
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

98

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

150

41%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

238
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

143

38%

LEVEL 4

95

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.