Skip to Content
Main content

IS 392 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

112

40%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

66

41%

LEVEL 4

61

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

74

42%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

135
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

146
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

89

41%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

95

39%

LEVEL 4

80

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

109

43%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

32

47%

LEVEL 4

18

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

56

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

74

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.