BRONX CHARTER SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

99

48%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

95

46%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

56

53%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

47

42%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

48

49%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

24

55%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

68

45%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

89

51%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

91

49%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

124
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

94

52%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

86

49%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

16

52%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

8

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

10

50%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

92

51%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

85

45%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

88

49%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.