HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY WEST CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

148

39%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

136

38%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

81

45%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

75

41%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

159
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

163
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

109

40%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

25

37%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

126

42%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

24

30%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

143

40%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

205
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

27

51%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

31

42%

LEVEL 4

23

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

132

39%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.