Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN EXCELSIOR CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

143

36%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

162
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

125

36%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

202
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

136

34%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

210
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

181
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.