KIPP STAR COLLEGE PREP CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

172

36%

LEVEL 4

84

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

45

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

41

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

122
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

101
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

87

40%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

112

42%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

140

41%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

48

46%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

207
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

130

37%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

250
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

84

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

153

37%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.