BRONX CHARTER SCH-EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

215

40%

LEVEL 4

113

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

151

28%

LEVEL 3

211

40%

LEVEL 4

134

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

122

43%

LEVEL 4

71

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

118

41%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

122
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

87

39%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

123
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

76

41%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

132

28%

LEVEL 3

208

44%

LEVEL 4

110

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

196

42%

LEVEL 4

126

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

22

38%

LEVEL 2

26

45%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

324
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

211

41%

LEVEL 4

113

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

338
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

132

26%

LEVEL 3

204

41%

LEVEL 4

134

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

34

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

35

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

172

41%

LEVEL 4

79

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

172

40%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

321
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

152

29%

LEVEL 3

208

40%

LEVEL 4

113

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.