NYC LAB MS-COLLABORATIVE STUDIES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

487
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

27

5%

LEVEL 3

127

24%

LEVEL 4

360

67%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

497
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

35

6%

LEVEL 3

98

18%

LEVEL 4

399

74%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

182

81%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

195

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

277
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

19

6%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

178

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

265
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

204

69%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

18

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

22

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

281
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

15

5%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

215

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

337
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

276

78%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

110

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

88

70%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

11

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

2%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

343

74%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

466
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

2%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

383

80%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

486
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

24

5%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

360

68%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

495
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

35

7%

LEVEL 3

97

18%

LEVEL 4

398

75%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

223

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

325
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

7%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

255

72%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

137

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

144

76%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.