Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 266 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

87

22%

LEVEL 3

146

37%

LEVEL 4

118

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

106

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

83

44%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

65

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

57

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

53

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

23

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

15

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

35

42%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

25

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

129

39%

LEVEL 4

116

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

105

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

25

41%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

22

47%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

264
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

118

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

233
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

106

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

70

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

70

35%

LEVEL 4

63

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

260
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

142

37%

LEVEL 4

118

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

231
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

105

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.