URBAN ASSEMBLY BRONX OF LETTERS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

107

44%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

57

48%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

52

45%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

67

54%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

71

56%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

39

45%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

64

44%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

47

62%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

52

74%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

82

39%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

20

51%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.