PS 239 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

28

25%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

38

35%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

14

45%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

26

53%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

34

65%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.