AMISTAD DUAL LANGUAGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

85

39%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

82

44%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

116
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

22

36%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

21

45%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

20

37%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

81

37%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

22

45%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

21

57%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.