MOTT HALL III GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

93

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

111

32%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

64

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

75

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

67
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

33

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

147
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

73

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

119

40%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

108

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

93

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

219
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

109

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

97

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

200
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

87

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

206
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

102

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.