Skip to Content
Main content

MS 319 MARIE TERESA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

79

50%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

108

36%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

129

43%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

92

37%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

44

72%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

63

72%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

66

72%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

26

55%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.