Skip to Content
Main content

PS 254 ROSA PARKS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

56

42%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

65

50%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

41

27%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

16

44%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

16

46%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

114

48%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

114

46%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

30

47%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

86

40%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

143
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

113

43%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.