TAG YOUNG SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

12

3%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

310

78%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

306

77%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

148

78%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

154

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

201
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

162

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

152

78%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

19

76%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

17

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

159
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

142

89%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

161
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

143

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

44

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

51

82%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

68
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

41

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

40

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

55

72%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

44

66%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

375
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

4%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

305

78%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

163

78%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

183

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

5%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

147

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

123

75%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

377
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

12

3%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

304

78%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

375
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

4%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

303

77%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.