TOMPKINS SQUARE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

104

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

66

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

38

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

25

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

27

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

47

78%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

33

54%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

104

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

30

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

50

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

101

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.