Skip to Content
Main content

COMP MODEL SCH PROJECT MS 327 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

46

32%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.