UNION VALE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

137

26%

LEVEL 2

188

35%

LEVEL 3

128

24%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

135

24%

LEVEL 2

180

32%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

106

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

99

21%

LEVEL 2

168

36%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

91

19%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

142

29%

LEVEL 4

105

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

38

56%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

44

54%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

132

28%

LEVEL 4

100

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

27

32%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

41

42%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.