Skip to Content
Main content

CLARKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

119

30%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

59

34%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

95

27%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

53

76%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

51

78%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

80

42%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

144
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

144
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.