Skip to Content
Main content

FIELDSTONE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

176

37%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

172

36%

LEVEL 2

176

37%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

117

44%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

44

43%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

112

46%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

104

41%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

82

20%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

121

29%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

51

75%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

51

77%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

132

31%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

44

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

43

83%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

127

43%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.