Skip to Content
Main content

HELLENIC CLASSICAL CS PARK SLOPE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

130

41%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

119

38%

LEVEL 4

93

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

67

43%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

61

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

63

39%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

34

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

37

39%

LEVEL 4

37

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

18

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

61

46%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

121

41%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

222
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

130

42%

LEVEL 4

92

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

50

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

51

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

214
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

124

41%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.