Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST CROWN HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

152

28%

LEVEL 3

224

41%

LEVEL 4

123

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

222

40%

LEVEL 4

115

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

185
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

187
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

112

42%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

110

42%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

332
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

213

41%

LEVEL 4

119

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

323
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

213

40%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

193

43%

LEVEL 4

112

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

200

44%

LEVEL 4

107

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

48

48%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

47

40%

LEVEL 4

39

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

47

40%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

177

42%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

175

40%

LEVEL 4

87

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

330
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

215

42%

LEVEL 4

115

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.