ACHIEVEMENT FIRST E NY CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

98

23%

LEVEL 3

201

47%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

184

44%

LEVEL 4

111

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

111

51%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

99

44%

LEVEL 4

77

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

90

44%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

85

44%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

232
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

150

47%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

218
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

133

42%

LEVEL 4

85

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

48

53%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

44

49%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

173

48%

LEVEL 4

105

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

172

46%

LEVEL 4

108

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

28

45%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

307
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

200

48%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

293
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

100

24%

LEVEL 3

182

44%

LEVEL 4

111

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

25

51%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

22

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

176

47%

LEVEL 4

94

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

166

45%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

295
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

191

48%

LEVEL 4

104

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.