KIPP INFINITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

67

12%

LEVEL 2

174

32%

LEVEL 3

201

37%

LEVEL 4

103

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

166

31%

LEVEL 3

202

38%

LEVEL 4

108

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

112

41%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

104

39%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

94
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

221
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

140

37%

LEVEL 4

81

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

210
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

142

40%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

173

43%

LEVEL 4

99

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

104

26%

LEVEL 3

172

43%

LEVEL 4

100

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

61

42%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

296
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

193

39%

LEVEL 4

103

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

295
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

143

30%

LEVEL 3

189

39%

LEVEL 4

106

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

26

53%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

14

27%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

161

32%

LEVEL 3

194

38%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

186

38%

LEVEL 4

92

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

261
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

157

33%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

30

43%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.