WILLIAMSBURG COLLEGIATE CHRTR SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

66

44%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

41

48%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

21

38%

LEVEL 2

23

42%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

143
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.