KIPP AMP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

170

37%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

72

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

147

37%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

214
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

161

40%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

156

41%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

164

42%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

251
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

168

37%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

72

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

14

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

31

54%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

152

37%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

149

36%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

230
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.