Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM CHLDRN ZONE ACADEMY II GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

184

40%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

70

15%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

181

39%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

92

41%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

195
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

145

39%

LEVEL 3

147

39%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

194
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

147

39%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

32

45%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

172

44%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

168

44%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

37

52%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

40

49%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

248
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

170

37%

LEVEL 3

183

40%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

243
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

179

39%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

34

40%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

36

44%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

150

39%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

145

38%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

221
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

167

40%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.