ACADEMY OF PUBLIC RELATIONS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

91

43%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

44

44%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

33

32%

LEVEL 2

50

48%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

55

49%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

58

53%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

22

40%

LEVEL 2

26

47%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

70

44%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

28

64%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

83

47%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

30

77%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

80

42%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.