LOWER MANHATTAN COM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

138

40%

LEVEL 4

101

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

125

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

70

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

67

46%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

110
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

68

45%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

42

41%

LEVEL 4

45

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

57

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

26

47%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

121

45%

LEVEL 4

86

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

109

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

15

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

236
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

101

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

245
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

124

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

78

39%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

224
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

99

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

13

62%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.