JONAS BRONCK ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

42

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

46

39%

LEVEL 4

40

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

87

40%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

82

39%

LEVEL 4

66

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

23

49%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

25

49%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

158
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

68

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.