Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOLARS' ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

628
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

36

5%

LEVEL 3

191

28%

LEVEL 4

437

65%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

595
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

38

6%

LEVEL 3

140

22%

LEVEL 4

455

71%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

369
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

274

71%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

345
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

275

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

259
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

163

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

180

63%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

11

85%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

157
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

126

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

167
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

151

89%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

174

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

164

64%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

38

43%

LEVEL 4

45

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

60

67%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

76

61%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

75

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

585
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

12

2%

LEVEL 3

164

27%

LEVEL 4

421

70%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

559
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

3%

LEVEL 3

122

21%

LEVEL 4

437

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

43
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

18

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

337
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

24

7%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

240

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

317
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

229

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

291
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

12

4%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

197

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

226

75%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.