Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL OF INTEGRATED LEARNING GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

60

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

96

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

42

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

70

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

55

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

142
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

79

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

60

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

95

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

20

57%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

96

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

23

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

157
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.