LEADERSHIP PREP BEDFORD STUYVESANT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

141

27%

LEVEL 3

228

44%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

63

12%

LEVEL 2

140

26%

LEVEL 3

221

42%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

124

43%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

114

45%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

290
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

198

44%

LEVEL 4

92

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

279
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

190

42%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

13

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

112

24%

LEVEL 3

218

47%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

121

26%

LEVEL 3

203

44%

LEVEL 4

102

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

16

28%

LEVEL 2

29

50%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

337
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

227

44%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

326
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

219

42%

LEVEL 4

107

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

10

67%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

39

46%

LEVEL 4

22

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

29

38%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

189

43%

LEVEL 4

88

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

192

42%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

317
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

210

43%

LEVEL 4

107

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

18

55%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.