Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 1 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

456
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

58

11%

LEVEL 3

281

54%

LEVEL 4

175

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

68

15%

LEVEL 3

221

48%

LEVEL 4

170

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

126

49%

LEVEL 4

106

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

105

46%

LEVEL 4

87

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

34

13%

LEVEL 3

155

59%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

199
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

116

49%

LEVEL 4

83

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

320
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

199

55%

LEVEL 4

121

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

277
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

155

48%

LEVEL 4

122

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

66

57%

LEVEL 4

34

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

49

45%

LEVEL 4

40

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

35

9%

LEVEL 3

218

53%

LEVEL 4

158

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

44

11%

LEVEL 3

190

49%

LEVEL 4

156

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

80
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

63

58%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

31

42%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

446
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

57

11%

LEVEL 3

274

54%

LEVEL 4

172

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

387
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

67

15%

LEVEL 3

217

47%

LEVEL 4

170

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

50

56%

LEVEL 4

34

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

31

48%

LEVEL 4

26

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

372
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

54

13%

LEVEL 3

231

54%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

334
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

60

15%

LEVEL 3

190

48%

LEVEL 4

144

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

420
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

53

11%

LEVEL 3

259

54%

LEVEL 4

161

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

22

54%

LEVEL 4

14

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.