ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BUSHWICK CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

117

20%

LEVEL 3

267

45%

LEVEL 4

167

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

121

20%

LEVEL 3

272

45%

LEVEL 4

166

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

136

49%

LEVEL 4

95

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

224
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

127

44%

LEVEL 4

97

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

131

43%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

214
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

145

47%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

74

44%

LEVEL 4

40

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

108
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

68

41%

LEVEL 4

40

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

309
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

187

46%

LEVEL 4

122

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

318
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

82

19%

LEVEL 3

197

47%

LEVEL 4

121

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

78

17%

LEVEL 3

221

47%

LEVEL 4

161

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

79

17%

LEVEL 3

223

48%

LEVEL 4

153

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

46

39%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

404
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

99

19%

LEVEL 3

241

45%

LEVEL 4

163

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

412
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

246

44%

LEVEL 4

166

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

26

48%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

26

58%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

24

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

34

43%

LEVEL 4

27

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

381
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

99

19%

LEVEL 3

238

46%

LEVEL 4

143

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

377
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

110

21%

LEVEL 3

238

46%

LEVEL 4

139

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

421
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

111

20%

LEVEL 3

258

46%

LEVEL 4

163

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.