ACADEMY OF APPLIED MATH AND TECH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.