Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX GREEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

129

35%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

53

30%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

62

33%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

76

39%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

24

35%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

52

72%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

130

37%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

118

35%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

20

40%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.