Skip to Content
Main content

COMMUNITY HEALTH ACAD OF THE HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

28

65%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

32

74%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.