WASHINGTON HGTS EXPEDITIONARY LEARN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

61

43%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

105

43%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

42

68%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

23

51%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

20

43%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.