Skip to Content
Main content

WORLD JOURNALISM PREPARATORY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

79

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

54

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

51

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

28

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

28

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

17

39%

LEVEL 4

21

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

27

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

29

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

31

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

24

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

80

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

73

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

82

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

79

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

42

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

35

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

52

38%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

44

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

80

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

78

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.