PS 506 JOURNALISM AND TECHNOLOGY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

106

32%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

44

44%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

41

66%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

44

64%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

108

41%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

54

71%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

55

64%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

105

33%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.