Skip to Content
Main content

FRANK A SEDITA SCHOOL #30 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

220

50%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

64

14%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

218

46%

LEVEL 2

157

33%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

101

45%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

111

45%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

119

55%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

41

59%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

29

43%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

186

58%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

195

54%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

153

45%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

160

43%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

67

67%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

143

69%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

153

67%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

211

50%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

210

46%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

76

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

206

49%

LEVEL 2

143

34%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

208

46%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.