Skip to Content
Main content

KINGS COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

167
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

149
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

41

40%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

173
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.