Skip to Content
Main content

COLUMBIA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

174

66%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

15

6%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

184

76%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

105

73%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

109

82%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

69

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

75

68%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

18

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

16

89%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

46

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

54

93%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

36

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

34

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

65

66%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

66

72%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

174

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

181

84%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

100

77%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

112

92%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

74

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

72

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

221
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

169

69%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

205
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

173

77%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

11

61%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.