LEADERS OF TOMORROW GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

128

36%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

114

57%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

44

36%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

60

46%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

70

70%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

85

83%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

33

77%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

125

37%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

167

48%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

159

48%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

19

49%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

22

47%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.