URBAN ASSEMBLY SCH-CRIMINAL JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

34

40%

LEVEL 4

24

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

71

39%

LEVEL 4

55

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

69

40%

LEVEL 4

55

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

50

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.