URBAN INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

68

19%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

84

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

19

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

9

22%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

120
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

80

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

36

53%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

84

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

33

46%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

34

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

79

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.